It’s developing organically, has both online and offline elements, and – as you can imagine – is complicated. As you would expect from any representation of multiple relationships. Of course I’m talking about social-networking Netiquette. It is taking shape among millions of teens and 20-somethings as I write, and it’s growing out of a formula that looks something like this (thoughtfully boiled down and reported by the Los Angeles Times): “First, name the eight most important people in your life – friends, family, rock stars. These are your Top 8. Now rank those people in order of importance. Finally, send a copy of this list to everybody you know, including people who didn’t make the cut. Be careful not to hurt the wrong feelings, or you may end up getting bumped from other people’s Top 8s. Go ahead and bite your nails. Realize the magnitude of these decisions.” This is the kind of thinking the social-networkers at your house or school are going through. It just might interfere with homework. ;-) But isn’t it great to know that etiquette rules are developing? Example: “Number of friends: Too many, you’re deemed a ‘MySpace whore,’ too few, a loser. (Caveat: If you’re in a band, or you’re a middle-school kid who lied about your age to get on MySpace and are competing with friends to see who’s most popular, ‘too many’ is a good thing [but then that would mark you as underage, right?].)” The article’s a great read, and – for people who think “kids have no manners these days” – essential reading. Wasn’t etiquette always based on civilization’s social realities and necessities? Social-networking is a fledgling but real part of civilization now, and good behavioral thinking is in process.
Leave a Reply