Law Prof. Mary-Rose Papandrea at Boston College recently looked at “all of the various justifications for limiting juvenile speech rights” – including the in loco parentis doctrine and Tinker’s material disruption test – and “concludes that none of them supports granting schools broad authority to limiting student speech in the digital media.” In “Student Speech Rights in the Digital Age,” she advises that, instead of making punishment or the restricting of digital speech, schools’ primary approach should be to “educate their students about how to use digital media responsibly.” Her article will appear soon in the Florida Law Review.
Leave a Reply